id·i·ot·ol·o·gy, Political Blog, Conservative Bloggers, Republican Blogspot, Political Blogs

About Me

Name: Kevin L. Kitchens

News and Opinion

Comments

Atlanta Politics...
100% of Americans...

Atlanta
REAMED
Obama's new title...

Jennifer
Juan McCain is a...
Who'll Stop McCain?

Upland Patriot
Hey, I remember...
id·i·ot·ol·o·gy

Steve Barton

Blog Roll

Get Townhall :: Get Your FREE Copy of the Townhall.com Magazine

Tell Me Why! You'd Vote for Hillary?

Posted by Kevin L. Kitchens on Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:02:03 PM

You'd Vote For Hillary
by Kevin L. Kitchens
(parody of I Don't Like Mondays by the Boomtown Rats)

The liberal brain inside her head
Is running on overload.
The country is going to lose today.
She's gonna lay claim to her throne.
And Billy doesn't understand it.
Always said she's a nagging crone.

And we can see no reasons
'cause there are no reasons
Can a reason even be shown?

Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
She wants to bring... this country down.

Her spin machine, wants to make her queen
So they lie to a believing world.
Well, the Breck Girl's shocked.
And so is Barack
But they seek to run with that spoiled little girl.
It's been her dream, since she was sixteen.
They'll be hell to pay if she meets defeat.

She sees lots of reasons
But there are no reasons
To commit an unreasonable deed!

Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
She wants to bring... this country down.

Down, down, down
Tear it all down!

And all the laughing's stopped
In the country now.
She wants to play with the boys awhile.
The primary's early
And soon we'll be learning
If the Constitution lives or if it dies.

And then the media hacks will
Let loose with cackles
As they explain all the hows and whys.

And they can see the reasons
That there was no reason
What reason made the voters blind?

And the liberal brain inside her head
Is running on overload.
The country is going to lose today.
She's gonna lay claim to her throne.
And Billy doesn't understand it.
Always said she's a nagging crone.

But he'll be the First Lady.
Of the old First Lady...
All reason now has flown

Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for, You'd vote for...
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for, You'd vote for...
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
Tell me why!
You'd vote for Hillary?
She wants to bring... this country down.

Email It |

Print It |

Comments (0) |

Trackbacks (0) |

Flag as Offensive

Why Darfur???

Posted by Kevin L. Kitchens on Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:18:51 AM

One thing that struck me in the DNC debate the other night, was the overwhelming concern for Darfur and the genocide going on there...

Don't get me wrong, I think it's an awful thing and feel that we SHOULD be doing something to prevent it, but it's the democrat hypocrisy that's confused me (though I supposed I should be used to it by now).

As has been proven to all but the ignorant and those with political motives, Iraq has been connected to terrorism, funding and harboring of their agents. What would in any other arena be classified as proof of WMDs having either been there, in process, or present were found countless times -- yet some continue to claim otherwise. Additionally, Saddam impeded the UN inspections over and over and over. In complete violation of UN resolutions both directly for those inspections AND the cease fire terms of the first Gulf War.

Finally, to top it all off, Saddam was in fact practicing genocide on the Kurdish people as well as his own. Many mass graves were found where we expected them to be as well as some we were led to by locals.

So clearly, the liberation of Iraq was justified on so many levels. Including genocide, the pet peeve of even bleeding heartless liberals.

Why then, when the United States should "not be involved in crises that do not affect our nationaly security" would the liberals make calls for us to get involved in the Darfur region, but decry our far more necessary involvement in Iraq?

Could it truly be that the democrats are claiming that Iraqis are less important than Africans? Would they be so racist? Or is it simply politics? Bush got to Iraq first, so darn it we have to kick him over it despite how we really feel.